by Frederick Mann
[Originally published in Build Freedom News.]
The Thieves Burn their Fingers
Earlier this year some terrocrats (terrorist bureaucrats) in South Florida stole the car
of someone who, as "public servants," they're supposed to serve and protect.
The "victim" - hereinafter referred to as the
plaintiff - being wise to the ways of terrocrats, had put all his assets out of harm's
way, except his car. So the terrocrats, following their policy of terror and plunder,
stole his car. They probably figured that was all they could steal from him.
But they chose the wrong plaintiff. He wrote a Criminal
Complaint, swore the Affidavit below, and filed criminal charges against the thieves and
Very important in this saga is the attitude of the
plaintiff. From his perspective, certain people had committed crimes against him and his
property. And what do you do when people commit crimes against you? Well, you gather the
available details, get all your facts straight, possibly do some legal research, and write
a Criminal Complaint.
Most victims of terrocrat crime may automatically and
unconsciously assume that they are worse off if crimes are committed against them by
terrocrats, rather than "non-government" criminals. There are two important
distinguishing factors here:
(1) "Non-government" criminals usually run away
after committing their crimes and may be difficult to find, whereas terrocrat criminals
tend to go back to their offices where they are relatively easy to locate. Also, if you
ask terrocrat criminals for their names and serial numbers, they often oblige, whereas
"non-government" criminals are seldom so "co-operative!"
(2) Terrocrat criminals tend to commit two types of crimes:
(a) Crimes in accordance with their "law" - they just "do their jobs in
accordance with the law" - making it difficult or impossible for the victim to get
any recourse; (b) Crimes that clearly and unequivocally violate their own "law."
An example of a type (a) crime (committed by a policeman)
would be if a policeman arrested a prostitute when the evidence that he or she engaged in
sex for pay is indisputable - and the policeman's "law" prohibits sex for pay.
The theft of the plaintiff's car, described in the
Affidavit below, is a type (b) crime. The terrocrats clearly violated their own
"law" by not obtaining a court order before seizing the car.
----------- The Affidavit -----------
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE
FOR CRIMINAL TRESSPASS AND GRAND THEFT
COMES NOW, _____________ being duly sworn upon his oath deposes and sats as
Affiant files this affidavit because he has probable cause to believe that a crime
has been committed against the people of the state of Florida and particularly against
____________ by the following persons individually and acting in concert.
a). As to _____________, On or about ________ 1995, at approximately 8:00 A.M., an
agent of the Internal Revenue Service known as Revenue Officer ___________ entered upon
the property of affiant without permission of affiant, against his will, and over his
objections, without a court order or other authority whatsoever, thereby comitting the
crime of tresspass.
Once she unlawfully gained access to the property, __________ proceeded to commit
the felony of Grand Theft and Conversion by removing from the premises the following
described property: a __________ automobile, VIN No. ___________.
b). As to __________, Deputy Sheriff ___________ and Sgt. __________ on or about
_______ 1995, at 8:00 A.M. at the direction of Internal Revenue Service Revenue Officer
____________ , together and individually, and at her request but without any court order
and without permission of the affiant entered upon the property of affiant, against his
will and over his objections, thereby comitting the crime of tresspass.
Once Deputy Sheriff _________ and Sgt. __________ gained access to the property,
they individually and in concert with Revenue Officer ____________ proceeded to commit the
felony of Grand Theft and Conversion by removing from the premises the automobile of
affiant with particularity described as one __________ automobile, VIN No.
c). On _________ 1995, at about 8:00 A.M., an agent and employee of ________
Towing, Inc. (_______ Last name unknown) entered upon the property and individually,
without affiant's permission, against his will, and over his objections, without a court
order or other authority whatsoever, thereby committing the crime of tresspass.
Once he unlawfully gained access to the property, he proceeded to commit the felony
of Grand Theft and Conversion by removing from the premises the following described
property: a __________ automobile, VIN No. _________________.
d). On _______ 1995, at approximately 1:00 P.M. _________ Supervisor of _________ ,
refused to release my property and admitted that she authorized __________ 's actions when
______ entered upon the property of affiant without permission of affiant, against his
will, and over his objections, without a court order or other authority whatsoever,
thereby comitting the crime of tresspass and ______ was in agreement with them and a
co-conspirator in the action. Further, when asked for her delegation of authority, she
failed to properly display same.
Now, therefore, the Sheriffs of the State of Florida are directed to take the above
named persons into custody forthwith.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT
Before me, the undersigned authority, did personally appear ____________,
personally known to be the person described above who acknowledged that he did in fact
prepare the foregoing document under his own free will this _______________ 1995.
Notary Public, State of Florida at Large
My Commission Expires: _____________
----------- End of Affidavit -----------
Return of the Vehicle
It took the plaintiff seven days to put together a 10-page Criminal Complaint as well as
the above Affidavit, and to deliver the Affidavit to the various parties concerned,
including the State Attorney, the Internal Security Division of the IRS, and the Captain
of the Sheriff's Department. The car was returned in less than three days after the
delivery of the Affidavit. (This would probably have happened sooner if the Affidavit had
been delivered to the Criminal Investigation Division of the IRS, instead of the Internal
The plaintiff reports that the sheriffs routinely operated
on the basis that they believed the IRS agents had obtained the necessary court orders
before seizing or confiscating property. Because the plaintiff regards the sheriffs and
towing company people as relatively innocent parties to the crimes, he decided to not
proceed against them.
However, the plaintiff is awaiting an "Administrative
Settlement" from the IRS. In the absence of a satisfactory settlement, he intends to
insist that the IRS agents be arrested and prosecuted for their crimes. (In this case, if
the sheriffs were to fail to arrest the IRS agents, a Criminal Complaint could be filed
against them for failing to perform their duties.)
Other Possible Charges
Prior to the automobile theft, the plaintiff received some "threatening
communications" from the IRS. Not being a "taxpayer subject to IRS
jurisdiction," may constitute attempted extortion by the IRS which could be
The plaintiff could also file suit under Title 18 for
"Deprivation of Rights" or under Title 42 for "Violation of Civil
Very interestingly, an IRS attorney called the towing
company owner and asked him if the car had been taken from the driveway or street, or from
the car port. The answer was, "From the car port." Then the attorney asked if
the car port was attached to the plaintiff's house or under a common roof. The answer was,
"Oh no!" said the attorney, apparently alarmed.
The concern of the IRS attorney was probably because the action of the IRS agents could
also be construed as 'breaking-and-entering'."
The significance of this is that the Affidavit could have
been broadened to include the fact that the thieves and their accomplices committed or
were parties to the felony of 'breaking-and-entering.' In any case, the plaintiff has the
option to add 'breaking-and-entering' to the charges against the IRS terrocrats.
A further possibility is to ask IRS terrocrats whether they
are representatives or employees of the U.S. Federal Govenment. If they say
"yes," they could possibly be criminally charged for fraudulently impersonating
government officials - see next article.
Steps to Consider
1. IRS terrocrat(s) and accomplices arrive at your home to plunder your
property. Ask them if they have a court order and demand to see it. Then ask them for
their names and ID #s. If they don't have a court order, demand that they leave your
property: "Leave my property right now; you're trespassing." Tell them that you
object to their violation of your rights and theft of your property.
2. Draw up a Criminal Complaint, with
legal or paralegal assistance, if necessary, and get it notarized.
3. Draw up an Affidavit and get it
notarized. Also consider filing it with the County Recorder.
4. File criminal charges with the police
against the thieves and their accomplices.
5. Decide whether you want to let the
criminals off easy or go after them seriously. If you decide to go easy on them, make
deals such as, "If you provide such and such a written undertaking, I'll drop the
6. If you decide to go after them
seriously, draw up a 'Notice and Demand' in which you set out your claims for damages and
restitution against each offender, get it notarized, and file it with the County Recorder.
(Give them 30 days to pay.)
7. Deliver copies of the Affidavit and
Notice of Demand to all the offenders.
8. If they haven't paid after 30 days,
file Commercial Liens against all the offenders.
9. Use the Commercial Liens to pay off
mortgages, or sell them to a "Commercial Lien Discounter."
As an alternative to Step 6, you may also consider filing a
Title 18 (deprivation of rights) suit, or a Title 42 (civil rights violation) suit.
In America, right now, there are almost certainly more than 10,000 people - possibly more
than 100,000 - who adopt the attitude of the above plaintiff and who take the kind of
actions the plaintiff did, when being criminally victimized by terrocrats. This number is
probably growing rapidly.
At the same time, the legal means to defend yourself, your
earnings, your property and assets is improving all the time and becoming more accessible
via Internet, computer bulletin boards, and from patriot organizations that specialize in
It's for such reasons that the terrocrat tyranny is
gradually losing its power. However, some creatures are most dangerous when experiencing
their last death throes - so, beware!
Feedback: What did you think of this article? We'd like to hear your thoughts. (Please mention the name of the article to which you are responding.)